Change stalls at the last mile
Programmes are announced, content is published, completion is reported. It can still be difficult to know whether a regional sales team is ready for the new conversation with a customer.
For executive teams and boards
Your strategy moves at the speed your people can apply it.
Every transformation, product launch and regulatory change depends on people doing something differently. Aixa turns your company knowledge into interactive learning and practice with Digital Human coaches, helping people build capability and giving you a clearer view of their progress.
- Deployment
- Start with one focused use case
- Source of truth
- Grounded in your company knowledge
- Data
- Swiss-built, European hosting
- Reporting
- Learning evidence to inform decisions
Digital Human coachingCompany knowledge, real conversationsEnterprise SSO & role-based accessPractice, feedback & progress
The executive gap
You approved the strategy. Are your people ready to apply it?
The distance between a decision made at board level and a behaviour changed at the front line is where value quietly disappears. Three symptoms, all of them expensive.
Expertise walks out of the building
Your best operators, underwriters and engineers carry judgement that documents rarely capture fully. Bringing their examples and methods into learning experiences helps more people benefit from that expertise before it leaves the business.
Assurance rests on assertion
When a regulator, an auditor or your own risk committee asks whether people understood the policy, completion is only part of the answer. Assessment and practice can give you a more useful picture of understanding and where further support is needed.
What changes
Three ways to move from strategy to capability.
A Digital Human explains, listens and guides practice, with personalised feedback and checks on understanding. People learn at their own pace; your team retains control of the experience.
Speed
Faster access to the learning change demands
Policies, playbooks, onboarding material and transformation messages become interactive experiences employees can question in their own words and supported languages. People can return when they need help and practise without waiting for the next training window.
Capability
People rehearse before they perform
Staff practise the difficult conversation, the escalation, the compliance judgement in a safe environment, through experiences grounded in the knowledge and scenarios you provide. Feedback and repeat practice help them prepare before the real situation arises.
Evidence
Learning evidence you can put in a board pack
Participation, completion and assessment results help you see progress and identify where further practice or support may help. Exportable reports can inform executive discussions alongside operational measures of change.
The view from the top
From completion rates to a clearer view of readiness.
Illustrative learning data showing the questions an executive team can explore. This is a reporting concept, not a product screenshot or customer result. Measures depend on the learning experience and assessment criteria; they do not establish workplace performance on their own.
View 1 of 3
Which functions have completed the learning that supports adoption?
Illustrative completion rate: completed learners as a share of invited learners in each function. Lower participation helps focus follow-up; it is not a measure of operating-model adoption.
How are people performing against the scenario criteria?
Illustrative pass rate: assessed learners meeting the configured scenario criteria, using each learner’s latest completed assessment. Simulated performance guides further practice.
What can we evidence if we are asked tomorrow?
Illustrative completion rate by programme: completed learners divided by invited learners. Completion and assessment records support follow-up and can be shared through exportable reports.
The commercial case
Four benefits. A business case you can explore.
Explore transformation value, learning delivery savings, creator productivity, and more personalized learning within the same budget.
A transparent starting point
See the evidence ↓Values are in USD, excluding recoverable VAT. Source-backed starting values are distinguished from planning assumptions. External euro cost references use the fixed ECB rate of US$1.1355 per €1 on 29 September 2026, rounded to cents. This is not a live exchange rate.
US$30 per learner interaction hour, all in for qualifying corporate volumes. Edit this to match your contracted rate.
Operational comparison; setup costs excluded for all options.
Benefit 1
More rapid and effective business transformation.
Help people understand, practise and adopt the new way of working. Estimate the average Aixa support each impacted person would need, then compare today’s likelihood of success with your expected likelihood after that support.
People enablement is one contributor to success.
EY and Oxford research provides context on people-centred transformation. It does not establish the 45% Aixa scenario or isolate learning’s causal effect. The 180% ROI proxy concerns potential cloud-adoption benefits, not every transformation. Read the research context ↗
Benefit 2
Compare learning delivery costs.
The starting example is classroom learning with travel, with 100% of learning hours moved to Aixa. Compare delivery spending and employee time separately. This is a planning scenario, not an average corporate training budget.
What about faster and better learning?
A 2025 university study found stronger immediate learning gains and a median 49 minutes with a carefully designed AI tutor versus 60 minutes in an active classroom. It supports the potential of personalised, self-paced learning. It did not test Aixa, corporate training, long-term retention or personal-coach equivalence. The editable 18% classroom speed scenario uses that study as a reference — not an Aixa forecast. Read the study ↗
Benefit 3
Free your L&D team and experts for more strategic work.
The Aixa Creator Platform helps make ongoing learning production faster and more efficient. Explore how less production effort could release expert capacity for strategic work, while retaining human review and testing. This comparison includes the labour used to create learning.
An evidence-based starting point, with explicit assumptions.
Chapman Alliance’s historical survey of 249 organisations reports 43 team-hours per finished classroom hour, 79 for basic e-learning and 184 for interactive e-learning. These are effort benchmarks, not calendar durations. The role split, weekly availability and Aixa hours here are editable planning assumptions. Read the original 2010 report ↗
Benefit 4
More hours. More personal. The same annual cost.
Move either slider. The other adjusts automatically to keep the annual cost per person unchanged, including the value of their own time spent learning. Scenario figures are illustrative estimates, informed by the linked sources.
Annual economic cost per person$1,804.93per person / year, including their own learning time
Same annual cost, including employee learning time · sliders adjust together
Annual learning comparison
Before · illustrative mix
16 hLearning hours
2 h personal tutoring · 4 h e-learning · 10 h classroom
Content created for1,000 people
Shared course content, plus 2 hours of one-to-one tutoring.
$1,804.93
After · illustrative Aixa scenario
22.2 hLearning hours
1.39× the current learning hours · all delivered through Aixa
Content created for1,000 people
Individual Aixa conversations with shared or tailored content.
$1,804.93
Illustrative baseline: 16 learning hours per person, per year1,000 people reuse the content · 15 people per classroom
22.2 hours / year. Content created for: 1,000 people. Annual economic cost per person: $1,804.93.
Illustrative total includes content creation, delivery, travel and the employee’s own learning time, valued at $51.10/hour. It is an economic cost, not just the L&D budget. Admin is excluded from both approaches.
Annual cost breakdown per person
| Cost | Before | With Aixa |
|---|---|---|
| Content creation | $49.98 | $4.54 |
| Personal tutoring | $399.70 | $0 |
| E-learning delivery | $20 | $0 |
| Classroom delivery | $142.65 | $0 |
| Travel / logistics | $375 | $0 |
| Aixa learning | $0 | $665.99 |
| Employee learning time | $817.60 | $1,134.40 |
| Total excluding employee time | $987.33 | $670.53 |
| Total including employee time | $1,804.93 | $1,804.93 |
Creation per finished content hour: $2,855.90 classroom, $5,354.10 e-learning, $204.40 Aixa. Creation is spread across each course’s audience, not the 15-person class size. Coaching preparation is assumed included in the coach fee. These are modelled costs, not a supplier quote.
Assumptions and sources
The example uses 1,000 employees and an annual mix of 2 tutoring, 4 e-learning and 10 classroom hours. Its 16-hour total is close to the 16.7 hours in ATD’s 2026 report covering 2025. The mix, course reuse and costs are a scenario, not a measured average corporate programme.
Current creation: classroom 8 expert + 25 HR/L&D + 10 external working hours per finished content hour; basic e-learning 16 + 43 + 20. Aixa: 2 expert + 2 HR/L&D + 0 external hours. Current 43/79-hour totals use historical Chapman Alliance benchmarks; role allocations and Aixa effort are assumptions. All 14 classroom/e-learning content hours are assumed created once for this year and reused by 1,000 people. Tutoring preparation is assumed included in the tutoring fee.
Expert, HR/L&D and employee time use $51.10/hour and $51.10/hour respectively, based on the converted Destatis employer-cost reference. External creation uses $116.96/hour based on Freelancer-Kompass. The page’s stated currency conversion applies.
Personal tutoring is modelled as remote one-to-one coaching at $199.85/hour, using the converted RAUEN 2024 business-coaching reference as a proxy. E-learning delivery is an assumed $5 per learner-hour for hosting/platform usage, excluding content creation already counted.
Classroom groups use 15 people, the most common response in ATD’s 2025 report. Trainer cost is $1,703.25 per 8-hour day using the converted BDVT reference. Travel/logistics are assumed at $300 per person per classroom day, with none for remote tutoring, e-learning or Aixa. Partial days are prorated. Employee travel time is not included.
Aixa uses the hourly rate above and includes 4 hours of creation labour per finished content hour. Additional authoring/setup/maintenance charges are assumed zero. Admin is excluded equally from both approaches. Employee learning time is included on both sides. This is a model of the listed costs, not a quote covering every possible charge.
Annual Aixa cost per person = learning hours × (Aixa usage rate + employee hourly cost + creation cost per content hour ÷ average course audience). Both sliders solve this equation against the current annual cost. Average course audience is continuous, allowing the sliders to keep cost fixed; displayed slider values are rounded. Classroom groups are still rounded up to whole sessions. More learning hours do not establish better outcomes. Content personalization is separate from one-to-one delivery. Do not add Benefits 2 or 3 again.
These calculators answer different questions. To build a total learning cost, align the audience and time period, allocate content creation across its total users, then add delivery and learner-time costs once. Check for overlap between trainer preparation and content creation. Keep expected transformation value separate. Estimates are scenarios, not promises of savings or success.
Sources, dates and the starting assumptions
US$51.10 per worked hour
Destatis, Germany 2025, published April 2026: €45 per worked hour, converted to USD using the dated ECB reference. Broad employer labour cost; specialist roles may differ.
Destatis ↗US$1,703.25 per trainer day
BDVT/VBT 2026 recommended minimum of €1,500 for professional standard-content delivery, converted to USD. An association recommendation, not an observed market average. Extras excluded.
BDVT/VBT ↗US$199.85/hour · 12 hours
RAUEN 2024 business-coaching means: €175.98/hour, rounded to €176 before conversion, and 11.76 hours per programme, rounded to 12. German-language coaching, not school tutoring.
RAUEN survey ↗28 hours per participant
Destatis CVTS6, Germany 2020, published 2022. Historical pandemic-year course/seminar volume; not exclusively classroom learning.
Destatis CVTS6 ↗49 versus 60 minutes
Kestin et al., 2025, two university physics lessons; 194 eligible students. The 18% scenario is rounded from the median time difference. Not Aixa or workplace evidence.
Scientific Reports ↗43 / 79 / 184 team-hours
Chapman Alliance 2010, per finished learning hour: classroom / basic / interactive e-learning. Historical effort benchmarks, not calendar durations. Role allocations and Aixa’s 4 hours (2 expert, 2 L&D, 0 external) are planning assumptions.
Original Chapman report ↗US$116.96 per hour
Freelancer-Kompass 2026 DACH survey: €103/hour, converted to USD. General freelancer average; 83% of respondents were in Germany. Reference for separately commissioned production, not an extra Aixa service fee.
Freelancer-Kompass ↗35% met objectives
BCG 2021 global digital-transformation survey, more than 850 companies. Historical cross-country result; replace with the probability for your own programme.
BCG research ↗€189,000 per year
KfW 2025 report, published 2026, using 2024 data. Average annual digitalisation expenditure of active German SMEs with 50+ employees. Historical EUR scale reference, not a complete transformation budget or the starting investment in the USD scenario.
KfW report · figure 18 ↗Editable, never implied evidence
US$1 million, 1,000 supported people and 2 average hours are illustrative assumptions. The 45% success likelihood is not a measured Aixa result. Role allocations, Aixa effort and staffing are also assumptions. Hours determine cost, not an automatic success improvement.
Build the evidence for your case ↗US$30 per learner interaction hour
Aixa’s all-in USD commercial rate for qualifying corporate volumes. Edit the calculator rate to match your agreement. Aixa learning cost is additional to the transformation investment; setup costs are excluded.
180% potential ROI
McKinsey, 15 November 2023, on potential business-benefit ROI from cloud adoption. A proxy for the successful programme scenario, not a universal transformation average, an observed Aixa return or an annualised rate.
McKinsey · cloud ROI ↗US$1.1355 per €1
ECB reference rate for 29 September 2026. Euro cost references are converted at this fixed rate and rounded to cents. This is a dated reference, not a live exchange feed.
ECB · 29 September 2026 ↗External sources were checked in September 2026; their data years are shown below. Euro cost references are converted at the fixed ECB reference rate of US$1.1355 per €1 on 29 September 2026, rounded to cents. Values are not inflation-adjusted. The US$30 Aixa rate is a commercial input.
Discuss your business caseCalculations stay in your browser.
See it for yourself
Experience Aixa. Start a conversation.
Meet an Aixa Digital Human and explore how interactive learning can support AI adoption, onboarding, compliance and capability building. The executive introduction takes around 15 minutes and opens without an account. Ask questions and experience the approach for yourself.
Customer perspective
Together, we have developed forward-looking, AI-driven solutions that support our ambition to act as Innovators of Trust and position our organization for the next generation of digital capability. What stands out about Aixa is not only their technological edge, but their execution strength: a rare combination of professionalism, drive, and anticipatory thinking that translates vision into tangible outcomes.
Assurance
The questions your risk committee will ask first.
Swiss-built, European hosted
Developed in Switzerland and hosted on Microsoft Azure in Europe. Review the privacy policy for processing arrangements and safeguards.
Enterprise authentication
Single sign-on, role-based access and configurable user, creator and administrator rights.
Controlled knowledge
Experiences are grounded in your source material, with project-specific guidance that your team can review, test and update.
Consent-based Digital Humans
Custom avatars and voices exist only with the explicit permission of the people represented.
Exportable evidence
Exportable reports help you review participation, completion and assessment results alongside your existing business measures.
Security documentation
Review security and enterprise readiness and the Trust Centre for current documentation.
Deployment
Start with one use case. Build the case to scale.
Start with one business problem, useful source material and a clear way to assess progress. Your first experience gives you a practical basis for deciding what comes next.
- Define
Pick a problem that matters
A stalled rollout, an onboarding bottleneck, a sales message that is not landing. Choose a focused audience, accessible expertise and measures you can use.
- Build & review
Your knowledge becomes an experience
Turn your material and expert input into an experience people can question and practise with. Your team reviews the guidance, scenarios and assessment criteria.
- Test & expand
Read the evidence, then decide
Review participation, assessment results and learner feedback with a first group. Refine the experience and decide where to expand, using operational measures where available.
Create independently, get guided support or start with a two-hour Transformation Sprint. Explore ways to get started →
An executive briefing, your agenda.
Bring the strategic priority where people need to work differently. Together, we can scope a first use case, examine the cost assumptions and agree what useful evidence would look like.
Or speak to us first: support@iamaixa.com